I recently received the results of my WSET Diploma Unit 1 Case Study – and I have good news and bad news:
The good news is . . . I Passed!
The bad news is . . . I Passed.
Now some (many?) of you might be thinking: WTF?! And you’d be right. Nonetheless, I am honestly a bit disappointed with a Pass. (Hey, they don’t call me Tracy Flick for nothing.) As I mentioned in an earlier post, a Pass means you scored anywhere from 55% to 64.9%. I have no idea where I fell within this range. I’m disappointed because I walked out of my exam incredibly confident that I’d given thorough answers and a detailed analysis. Except for writing more neatly, I honestly don’t know what else I could have done.
And unfortunately, it appears that I’ll have to remain in the dark on this because you can only receive feedback on your WSET Diploma exams if you fail. If you pass, but are unhappy with your mark, you can make an enquiry (essentially, challenge your grade) and have a different examiner re-mark your exam. But that’s not really what I’m after – I’d like to know what I could have done differently to earn a Merit or Distinction.
So – I’m a bit nervous because I gave it my best effort, felt confident, and . . . Passed. Does that mean I have to study harder for my next exam? Let’s fucking hope not, because I honestly don’t think I could have studied any more than I did. I could have, however, studied smarter.
But before I get to what I mean by that – let’s revisit what this part of Unit 1 is all about:
Unit 1 – Case Study Exam.
The case study is a unique beast in the WSET Diploma pursuit – it’s basically a crapshoot research project followed by an in-class exam. You sign up in advance and then, 30 days before the exam, the topic is released. Signing up means you’re all in – you cannot change your mind if you don’t like the topic.
So, after researching your topic for 30 days, you then take a 75 minute closed book handwritten exam. The exam usually consists of 3-4 questions related to your subject.
The pass rate for the case study has hovered around 80% the past few years. To put this in perspective, the dreaded Unit 3 has a pass rate usually around 40%. However, there must’ve been a shitty Unit 1 case study topic in November 2014 because it dipped below 60% for that exam. I’m guessing it was “Why Wine Scores are the Best Indicator of Wine Quality” or something equally as painful.
The case study always has a business focus – past subjects have included: Selling Wine Online, Restaurant Wine Lists, Sustainable Wine Tourism and The South African Wine Industry. My case study was “The Ups and Downs of the Sherry Market” and here’s the brief that I received:
And these were my exam questions:
I wasn’t surprised by any of these, and I felt well prepared for each question. Whew! So, I obviously focused some of my studies on the right things. But, I also missed what would’ve put me at the Premier or Grand Cru level of the Unit 1 pyramid (Hubs Note: I’m really trying to ween her off these terrible “replace-everyday-words-with-wine-words-of-the-same-meaning” schtick of hers. Please be patient.)
After hosting a minor pity party for myself (Hubs did not attend because he thought I was being ridiculous), I’ve decided that I’ll take my Village level grade and move on (Hubs Note: Insert Eye-Roll Emoji for doing it again. We get it – they’re wine words. Move on.). But, for future students tackling Unit 1 (or D2 as it’s now going to be called), here are some study tips that will help you Pass – and hopefully with Merit or Distinction:
Review Past Examiners’ Reports.
My recommendation: go over these before you even begin your research. Examiners’ reports are published annually on the WSET Global Campus website and include past exam topics and questions, an example of higher marked answer (so you can also see that your handwriting really isn’t as crappy as you think it is!), as well as “suggestions” for what would give a candidate a Merit or Distinction as opposed to a Pass.
Unfortunately, many of these suggestions are very vague. “Lack of analysis” is often cited as a reason, as is “lack of original thought.” “Failure to bring the topic to life” is another one – which is frequently used in tandem with “predictable and unimaginative.”
In hindsight, I probably could have added more original thought and given my opinion on the future of the Sherry market which might have helped “bring the topic to life.” However, as you can see above, “What’s your opinion on the future of the Sherry Market?” wasn’t one of the exam questions. So, I’m not sure how much I would have gained by giving my thoughts on something that wasn’t specifically asked. (Did I mention that “failure to address the question asked” is also a reason cited for not receiving a high score?)
Stay Out of Those Pesky Rabbit Holes.
My brief mentioned “in the last three decades” and “over the last thirty years” – clues that I would need to know what happened in the Sherry market since the 1990s. So where did I begin my research? Well, I promptly went back to when Sherry was likely established by the Phoenicians – 1110 BC.
Don’t Do This! Sure, I learned some interesting factoids – like that the Moors introduced distilling back in the 700s and that Shakespeare paid tribute to Sherry in his play Henry IV. I also revisited Sherry’s unique production method and spent a few days and several outline pages on this. But these were rabbit holes that could have, and should have, been avoided if I’d stayed on course with my research.
Thankfully, I have Unit 6 Fortified Wines coming up later this year, so my massive amount of Sherry research won’t be a complete waste of time. But, all this information did clutter up my limited amount of brain space and suck up precious time for Unit 1. Remember: the case study is focused on the business side of wine. So . . .
Have Some Stats in Your Back Pocket.
Statistics will help you avoid “lack of analysis” as mentioned above. Know several facts and figures related to your topic – dates, percentages, rankings, etc.
For example, my brief stated that there had been a “marked reduction in Sherry production and global sales.” So walking into the exam, I had at the ready:
- How much vineyard acreage had decreased since the 1970s
- Amount of peak Sherry production v. production today
- Total market broken into domestic sales v. exports
- The categories of Sherry that made up the highest %s of both domestic and export markets
- You see where I’m going with this . . .
Once you have your statistics memorized, don’t just regurgitate them. Be prepared to explain what they mean and cite your sources. And speaking of this . . .
Consult a Variety of Resources.
My topic was pretty easy in this aspect because there is a ton of information about Sherry. Almost TOO much. I had the incredibly thorough book by Julian Jeffs, the Consejo Regulador website, periodicals, podcasts, blogs, online articles, social media, etc. Do not discount the power of social media! I found Sherry guru, Ruben, through Twitter – he and his blog were immensely helpful.
However, there was so much information out there on Sherry that I (irrationally) thought might be relevant that I failed to stay the course. I read the entire Sherry book. I had umpteen articles on the “Sherry renaissance/resurgence/revival.” Instead of reading every single one of these – I should’ve saved time and brain power and stuck only to those written by knowledgeable people in more reputable journals (sorry Cosmo!)
Have an Opinion.
We wine people have an opinion on fucking everything – the best type of closure (screwcap – sorry, but it’s true), whether Crémant is a substitute for Champagne (nope) and which wine region is the most underappreciated (my beloved Washington state, obviously). When researching your case study exam, make sure to formulate some opinions – and be prepared to back them up.
I’m going out on a limb here . . . but even if you’re not specifically asked for your viewpoint, give it anyway. Personal commentary will “bring the topic to life” and provide “original thought” – both of which can gain you higher marks (according to past examiners’ reports). However, make it brief so that you don’t spend so much time opining and forget to answer the question asked!
Other Pre-exam Prep Suggestions.
Practice under exam conditions. I mentioned this in a previous post, but I highly recommend making a list of possible questions or topics, throwing them all in a hat, and then drawing a few out and answering them within a certain timeframe. This will help you better manage your time during the actual exam and will get you used to writing under pressure. Hey – it might even improve your handwriting too.
Listen to podcasts for information on the current market and opinions. You know I love my wine podcasts and I was very thankful for a couple in particular for my Sherry research. Vinepair gave some great insight into why consumers aren’t embracing Sherry as much as sommeliers are. And I’ll Drink to That had several in depth interviews with bodega owners, Sherry champions and writers.
While researching your topic – keep these questions in mind and be able to write about them:
- The pros and cons of your topic
- Any challenges faced
- Your future predictions or suggestions for improvement.
On exam day: make an outline before answering the question. I know it’s shocking that I’m advocating outlines. 😉 But seriously – if you dive headfirst into answering the question, you’re likely to forget something, spew a bunch of facts with no cohesiveness or just flat-out panic. Briefly sketching an outline will help keep you on track with your answer and ensure you hit the major points.
Best of Luck to future Diploma students on your Unit 1 Case Study! And stay tuned as I revisit Sherry in a couple of months when I start my Fortified Wines of the World – Unit 6 studies . . .
8 thoughts on “WSET Diploma Unit 1 Case Study: a Case for Studying Smarter . . .”
You know, I get it…I never got Distinction ( a couple of Merits) on any of the Units and my overall grade was a PASS. Am I disappointed? Yes, but in the end, the job market doesn’t care whether you got a straight pass, pass with merit or pass with distinction. As women, that’s our expectation right? To be perfect and get the best and biggest mark possible! Congratulations! You are well on your way! All the best for Unit 3!
Thank you (for your congrats, AND for putting things in perspective!) 😉 I always set the bar high for myself, so this was a bit of an eye-opener. But I’ve heard the Diploma pursuit is humbling . . . and that’s very true.
I felt the same way after the spirits exam – I honestly believed I had done better. But, as Marcia said, all that matters is that we pass. Hard to remember sometimes because it’s such a lot of freaking work – and earning a merit or distinction always feels good!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right?? It IS a lot of work! I think it’s also important to keep in mind how much we’ve learned in the process – regardless of whether it’s with Merit or Distinction. That being said, I hope you rock your Sparkling exam in a couple of weeks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! It’s crunch time and I’m feeling it. I laugh now when I think back to Level 3 and how much I stressed over that exam. Nice to remember there are fellow travelers on the path – solidarity! Keep on keepin’ on . . .
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep! Even though we’re on different coasts, I feel like we’re in this together! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m really interested in your personal opinion of the decline of sherry – where would you have take it to show “original thought?” I haven’t taken Unit1 yet, nor do I know a ton about the Sherry market, but there is always the market trends angle, aging population, differing generational tastes… but isn’t this angle not original? Perhaps the sale of tinned fish (sardines, anchovies) has also decreased due to an environment factor, therefore people don’t drink Sherry. I kid, I kid, but perhaps this is the “original” thought they are looking for 🤪
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well that’s definitely some original thought! 😉 And your question is a very good one. I’m cautiously kinda-sorta optimistic that when the Examiners Report is released and the Sherry case study is discussed that they’ll give concrete examples of what would have made an answer be an “original” one and “come to life.” But this might just be wishful thinking . . .